Home » Disclaimer

Disclaimer

No attorney-client relationship. Hamilton Law Firm LLC maintains this website exclusively for informational purposes. It is not legal or other professional advice and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Hamilton Law Firm LLC or its clients. Viewing this site, using information from it, or communicating with Hamilton Law Firm LLC through this site by Internet email does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Hamilton Law Firm LLC.

Nonreliance. Online readers should not act or decline to act, based on content from this site, without first consulting an attorney or other appropriate professional. Because the law changes constantly, this website's content may not indicate the current state of the law. Nothing on this site predicts or guarantees future results. Hamilton Law Firm LLC are not liable for the use or interpretation of information contained on this site, and expressly disclaim all liability for any actions you take or do not take, based on this site's content.

Links. Hamilton Law Firm LLC does not necessarily endorse and is not responsible for content accessed through this website's links to other Internet resources. Correctness and adequacy of information on those sites is not guaranteed, and unless otherwise stated, The Hamilton Law Firm LLC is not associated with such linked sites.

Contacting us. You may e-mail us through this site, but information you send to Hamilton Law Firm LLC through Internet e-mail or this website is not secure and may not be confidential. Communications to us will not be treated as privileged unless we already represent you. Do not send us confidential information until you have established a formal attorney-client relationship with Hamilton Law Firm LLC. Even if we represent you, understand that Internet e-mail security is still uncertain and that you accept all risks of such uncertainty and potential lack of confidentiality when you send us unencrypted, sensitive, or confidential e-mail. E-mail from Hamilton Law Firm LLC never constitutes an electronic signature, unless it expressly says so.

Jurisdiction. Legal problems and solutions depend on their unique facts. Laws and regulations often differ from one jurisdiction to another. Materials on this website may be inappropriate in jurisdictions other than Kansas. Hamilton Law Firm LLC's attorneys practice primarily in the State of Kansas. Users who access this website from other locations do so at their own risk and are responsible for complying with local laws and regulations. This website (not including linked sites) is controlled by Hamilton Law Firm LLC. The laws of Kansas apply to everything concerning use of this website, without regard to Kansas' conflict of laws principles. You agree to submit to the exclusive personal jurisdiction and venue of the appropriate Kansas court to resolve any dispute concerning your use of this website.

Recent Blog Posts

Negligence Lawsuits: What the Plaintiff Must Prove

February 6th, 2017

Negligence occurs when a party fails to exercise proper care and, as a result, damages occur. Laws surrounding negligence and liability vary from state to state, so it’s important to contact a Kansas and Missouri injury attorney to represent you… Read More

Legal Malpractice: What You Must Prove

February 6th, 2017

If you believe you were not represented properly by an attorney, a Kansas legal malpractice attorney can help determine if you may have a claim. As you can imagine, pursuing a claim against an attorney can be an uphill battle. Attorneys that may be p… Read More

Representative Work

$280,000 Jury Verdict in Legal Malpractice Case (January 18, 2017)

On January 18, 2017, Hamilton Law Firm LLC obtained a $280,000.00 jury verdict in a legal malpractice lawsuit for Power Control Devices, Inc., an Olathe company specializing in the manufacture of electronic devices. The underlying litigation involved a breach of contract lawsuit against Orchid Engineering, Technologies and Consulting in the Boston, Massachusetts area. After PCD’s case had been pending for almost two years, Orchid filed a motion for summary judgment contending the lawsuit was not filed before the statutes of limitation expired. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts agreed, dismissing Power Control’s claims as untimely. Hamilton Law firm sued Power Control’s attorney in the underlying litigation, Michael “Mick” Lerner, for legal malpractice. After a seven day jury trial in Johnson County Kansas District Court, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Power Control. PCD Verdict Form 2617 Read More

$2.1 Million Verdict in Medical Malpractice Case (April 10, 2015)

Attorneys Michael Hodges of Hodges Law Firm and Patrick Hamilton of Hamilton Law Firm obtained a $2.1 million jury verdict in a medical malpractice lawsuit in Johnson County, Kansas on April 10, 2015. The case involved an endometrial ablation procedure with a Boston Scientific Hydro Thermal Ablation (HTA) device that circulates 194º F saline solution throughout the uterus for 10 minutes to burn off the lining of the uterus. During the procedure, the defendant doctor punctured plaintiff’s uterine wall which allowed the scalding liquid to escape into plaintiff’s abdominal cavity causing severe burns to plaintiff’s intestines. Approximately two feet of plaintiff’s intestines had to be surgically removed, which forced the plaintiff to wear a colostomy bag for approximately one year. Lundeen Verdict 42115 Read More

Practice Areas

For More Information

Disclaimer

Practice Areas

For More Information

Recent Blog Posts

Representative Work

Contact Us