Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Hamilton Law Firm LLC
Hamilton Law Firm LLC

913-647-7512
Legal Question?

Menu
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
  • Why Choose Us
  • Representative Work
  • Legal News
  • Contact Us

Practice Areas

Business Litigation
Legal Malpractice
Local Counsel
Medical Malpractice
Nursing Home Abuse
Personal Injury
Product Liability
Wrongful Death

For More Information

Fill out our online form

Home » Lawyers See Rise in Legal Malp…

Lawyers See Rise in Legal Malpractice Claim Severity

July 22nd, 2014
Posted By
Patrick Hamilton
Tweet

KANSAS CITY -- JULY 22, 2014 -- Although the frequency of law firm malpractice claims has begun to level off following a post-recession surge, their severity has continued to increase. A new study by insurance broker Ames & Gough finds most leading legal malpractice insurers had a continuing increase in claims in excess of $50 million.

In its fourth annual survey of lawyers’ professional liability claims, Ames & Gough examined the trend by polling eight of the leading Lawyers’ Professional Liability insurance companies that on a combined basis insure more than 80 percent of the AM Law 100 firms. Four insurers either paid or participated in paying a claim of $100 million or greater; two others had a payment between $50 million – $100 million. Furthermore, six of the eight insurers surveyed reported having more claims with reserves of $500,000 or greater in 2013 than 2012.

“The complexity and longer development pattern of the post-recession claims together with soaring defense costs led law firms to experience a significant uptick in malpractice claim severity in 2013,” said Eileen Garczynski, partner and senior vice president of Ames & Gough.

Among specific practice areas, real estate law continues to see the largest number of malpractice claims, albeit not to the extent as in prior years. Meanwhile, corporate and securities received an equal number of responses from insurers (63 percent), an increase from the prior year.

“When business deals go bad, clients often look to their lawyers for compensation,” said Ms. Garczynski. “To minimize their risk of related malpractice actions, law firms need to maintain a strong conflicts database and clearly identify who they’re representing in a transaction. They should also avoid serving on their clients’ corporate boards.”

Conflict of interest remains by far the leading alleged legal malpractice error. This year, six of the eight insurers surveyed cite conflicts as the leading cause of malpractice claims.

“Law firms need to evaluate merger opportunities not only for growth, competitive leverage, and cultural synergies, but in terms of their potential risk issues,” Ms. Garczynski noted. “Before you shake hands, consider potential conflicts, ensure you have a sound strategy to combine the firms’ practices and their back-office functions, and perform proper due diligence on the firm’s people. Partners need to have similar philosophies to be successful working together long term.”

Half the insurers surveyed have had a Lawyers’ Professional Liability Insurance claim arising from a cyber or network security event. Of the four insurers with these claims, three traced the breach to a lost or stolen laptop. For the other, a combination of employee error, hacker and disgruntled employee led to a network security breach claim.

“Given how rapidly technology is evolving, it’s almost impossible to be free from cyber and data security risks,” said Ms. Garczynski. “Law firms need to assess how they exchange information and the type of client data they handle or maintain on their own systems. Once they have a basic understanding of their risks, they need to take the steps needed to address them.”

She added: “For cyber risks and the various other exposures law firms face today, a greater focus on firm-wide risk management is a key to reducing the likelihood of large malpractice claims and their costly consequences.”

The insurers participating in the Ames & Gough survey were: AIG/Lexington, AXIS, BRIT, CNA, Catlin, Ironshore, Markel, and Swiss Re Corporate Solutions.

Copies of the survey, Lawyers’ Professional Liability Claims Trends: 2014, may be obtained free of charge by emailing requests to: info@amesgough.com. Those requesting the survey should include their name, title, affiliation, and phone number, and state “LPL Claims Survey 2014” in the subject line.

Source: Ames & Gough

Categories: Legal News

Practice Areas

Business Litigation
Legal Malpractice
Local Counsel
Medical Malpractice
Nursing Home Abuse
Personal Injury
Product Liability
Wrongful Death

For More Information

Fill out our online form

Recent Blog Posts

18
Negligence Lawsuits: What the Plaintiff Must Prove
February 18th, 2021
Negligence occurs when a party fails to exercise proper care and, as a result, damages occur. Laws surrounding negligence and liability vary from state to state, so it’s important to contact a Kansas and Missouri injury attorney to represent your c… Read More
6
Legal Malpractice: What You Must Prove
February 6th, 2017
If you believe you were not represented properly by an attorney, a Kansas legal malpractice attorney can help determine if you may have a claim. As you can imagine, pursuing a claim against an attorney can be an uphill battle. Attorneys that may be p… Read More

Read more from our blog

Representative Work

$170,000 Jury Verdict in Negligent Misrepresenation Case
On April 24, 2018, attorney Patrick Hamilton obtained a $170,000 jury verdict in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in a negligent misrepresentation case. Hamilton Law Firm’s client purchased a house in Kansas City, Missouri. Defendant Kathryn Sylvia was the seller’s real estate agent and an employee of defendant Platinum Realty. The sale was a “cash sale” in which payment was to be wired. The plaintiff received wiring instructions via email from Sylvia’s email account. Plaintiff forwarded the wiring instructions to his bank, which wired his money in accordance with the instructions. In actuality, the wiring instructions were prepared by a criminal hacker which caused plaintiff’s funds to be misdirected to Citi Bank in New York City. When the loss was discovered, plaintiff sued Sylvia and Platinum for negligent misrepresentation. The defendants claimed they did not email the wiring instructions to plaintiff and that plaintiff was comparatively negligent by not reviewing the wiring instructions before sending them to his bank. After a two day jury trial, the jury assigned defendants 85% of the fault and attributed 15% of the fault to plaintiff. Total damages were $196,622.67 with a net recovery to plaintiff of $167,129.27. Bain v. Platinum Realty LLC et al., Case No. 16-CV-02326-JWL. Read More
$280,000 Jury Verdict in Legal Malpractice Case (January 18, 2017)
On January 18, 2017, Hamilton Law Firm LLC obtained a $280,000.00 jury verdict in a legal malpractice lawsuit for Power Control Devices, Inc., an Olathe company specializing in the manufacture of electronic devices. The underlying litigation involved a breach of contract lawsuit against Orchid Engineering, Technologies and Consulting in the Boston, Massachusetts area. After PCD’s case had been pending for almost two years, Orchid filed a motion for summary judgment contending the lawsuit was not filed before the statutes of limitation expired. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts agreed, dismissing Power Control’s claims as untimely. Hamilton Law firm sued Power Control’s attorney in the underlying litigation, Michael “Mick” Lerner, for legal malpractice. After a seven day jury trial in Johnson County Kansas District Court, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Power Control. PCD Verdict Form 2617 Read More

Read more about our successes

Contact Us

Google Map of Hamilton Law Firm LLC’s Location
Hamilton Law Firm LLC
8700 Monrovia, Suite 310
Lenexa, KS 66215
913-647-7512

© 2025 Hamilton Law Firm LLC
View Our Disclaimer
Law Firm Website Design by The Modern Firm

Copyright © 2025 Hamilton Law Firm LLC