Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Hamilton Law Firm LLC
Hamilton Law Firm LLC

913-647-7512
Legal Question?

Menu
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
  • Why Choose Us
  • Representative Work
  • Legal News
  • Contact Us

Practice Areas

Business Litigation
Legal Malpractice
Local Counsel
Medical Malpractice
Nursing Home Abuse
Personal Injury
Product Liability
Wrongful Death

For More Information

Fill out our online form

Home » Fainting Juror = $10 Million S…

Fainting Juror = $10 Million Settlement

August 11th, 2011
Posted By
Patrick Hamilton
Tweet

AUGUST 11, 2011 -- It's conventional wisdom among trial lawyers that you might very well be on your way to winning a case if your closing argument brings a juror to tears.

So imagine what attorney Robert Mongeluzzi must have been thinking when, 20 minutes into his opening statement on Monday in a personal injury case, Juror No.1 fainted.

Mongeluzzi was in the midst of describing a particularly grisly surgical procedure in which doctors were removing sections of rotting flesh and bone in the hope of avoiding an amputation of plaintiff Gary Pettet's right leg.

According to accounts from the plaintiffs team — Mongeluzzi and Andrew Duffy of Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett & Bendesky and Joel Wayne Garber of Voorhees, N.J. — the juror, a teacher from Philadelphia's Chestnut Hill section, had flinched and winced a few times and then suddenly pitched backward in her chair as her eyes rolled back in her head and she lost consciousness.

As her fellow jurors steadied her to prevent a fall, Mongeluzzi turned to Philadelphia Common Pleas Judge John M. Younge, who ordered his staff to call 911 and summon EMTs.

The trial never resumed because the impact of Mongeluzzi's oratory apparently gave the defense a case of the vapors, too, and the lawyers soon reported to Younge that they had struck a $10 million settlement — nearly double the figure offered before trial and about five times the amount offered in a failed mediation late last year.

For the plaintiff, the settlement brought a surprisingly swift conclusion to a court battle sparked by a life-changing auto accident in the early morning hours of July 3, 2007.

Pettet, a cement mason from Berlin, N.J., was driving to work and had just crossed the Ben Franklin Bridge into Philadelphia when he was struck by a PATCO truck driven by Stephen Cassidy.

PATCO's lawyers ultimately stipulated to liability in the case when a video from the bridge revealed that the accident was caused by Cassidy running a red light.

Pettet's truck was slammed into a median strip in the accident and he suffered multiple breaks of his right leg and a shattering of his right ankle.

Over the next few months, Pettet underwent 12 surgeries, including the installation of plates and screws in his leg.

But Mongeluzzi told the jury that the surgeries resulted in a series of complications and infections that ultimately forced the doctors to perform an amputation.

In his opening speech, Mongeluzzi described some of Pettet's harrowing medical procedures in vivid detail.

In the final minutes of his talk before the juror fainted, Mongeluzzi was describing a debriding procedure that doctors were forced to perform because the infection had become serious.

Mongeluzzi explained that in a debridement, the doctors "cut the infected, rotting flesh out of his ankle. And that includes his skin, that includes the subcutaneous muscle, and that includes dead, rotting, infected bone."

At the plaintiffs counsel table, Duffy said he was watching the jurors and noticed that Juror No. 1 was leaning forward, was extremely focused and seemed to be finding the details difficult to endure as she flinched at some of the more grisly moments.

Mongeluzzi went on to explain that the first debridement was not successful and was beginning to describe a second, similar procedure that was performed three days later when the juror was overcome.

Garber said the juror suddenly sat upright for a moment and that her head went back as she closed her eyes.

A transcript of the proceedings shows that Mongeluzzi interrupted his speech and said, "Your honor," but the transcribing ends there and does not record Younge's instructions to clear the courtroom and call for medical help.

In an interview, Garber said he had handled Pettet's case on his own for two years and decided to join forces with Mongeluzzi when it became clear that it could not be settled.

Prior to the trial, Garber said, the highest offer from the defense was $2.5 million. Mongeluzzi said the defense raised its offer to $5.25 million during jury selection but that he had insisted the case "could not settle for less than eight figures."

The plaintiffs team said they had expected to return to the courtroom after lunch to resume the trial, but that defense attorney John J. Snyder of Rawle & Henderson stopped them from leaving the courthouse and asked to renew settlement talks.

Snyder could not be reached for comment on the settlement.

Contact U.S. Courthouse Correspondent Shannon P. Duffy at 215-880-3700 or sduffy@alm.com.

Categories: Legal News

Practice Areas

Business Litigation
Legal Malpractice
Local Counsel
Medical Malpractice
Nursing Home Abuse
Personal Injury
Product Liability
Wrongful Death

For More Information

Fill out our online form

Recent Blog Posts

18
Negligence Lawsuits: What the Plaintiff Must Prove
February 18th, 2021
Negligence occurs when a party fails to exercise proper care and, as a result, damages occur. Laws surrounding negligence and liability vary from state to state, so it’s important to contact a Kansas and Missouri injury attorney to represent your c… Read More
6
Legal Malpractice: What You Must Prove
February 6th, 2017
If you believe you were not represented properly by an attorney, a Kansas legal malpractice attorney can help determine if you may have a claim. As you can imagine, pursuing a claim against an attorney can be an uphill battle. Attorneys that may be p… Read More

Read more from our blog

Representative Work

$170,000 Jury Verdict in Negligent Misrepresenation Case
On April 24, 2018, attorney Patrick Hamilton obtained a $170,000 jury verdict in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in a negligent misrepresentation case. Hamilton Law Firm’s client purchased a house in Kansas City, Missouri. Defendant Kathryn Sylvia was the seller’s real estate agent and an employee of defendant Platinum Realty. The sale was a “cash sale” in which payment was to be wired. The plaintiff received wiring instructions via email from Sylvia’s email account. Plaintiff forwarded the wiring instructions to his bank, which wired his money in accordance with the instructions. In actuality, the wiring instructions were prepared by a criminal hacker which caused plaintiff’s funds to be misdirected to Citi Bank in New York City. When the loss was discovered, plaintiff sued Sylvia and Platinum for negligent misrepresentation. The defendants claimed they did not email the wiring instructions to plaintiff and that plaintiff was comparatively negligent by not reviewing the wiring instructions before sending them to his bank. After a two day jury trial, the jury assigned defendants 85% of the fault and attributed 15% of the fault to plaintiff. Total damages were $196,622.67 with a net recovery to plaintiff of $167,129.27. Bain v. Platinum Realty LLC et al., Case No. 16-CV-02326-JWL. Read More
$280,000 Jury Verdict in Legal Malpractice Case (January 18, 2017)
On January 18, 2017, Hamilton Law Firm LLC obtained a $280,000.00 jury verdict in a legal malpractice lawsuit for Power Control Devices, Inc., an Olathe company specializing in the manufacture of electronic devices. The underlying litigation involved a breach of contract lawsuit against Orchid Engineering, Technologies and Consulting in the Boston, Massachusetts area. After PCD’s case had been pending for almost two years, Orchid filed a motion for summary judgment contending the lawsuit was not filed before the statutes of limitation expired. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts agreed, dismissing Power Control’s claims as untimely. Hamilton Law firm sued Power Control’s attorney in the underlying litigation, Michael “Mick” Lerner, for legal malpractice. After a seven day jury trial in Johnson County Kansas District Court, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Power Control. PCD Verdict Form 2617 Read More

Read more about our successes

Contact Us

Google Map of Hamilton Law Firm LLC’s Location
Hamilton Law Firm LLC
8700 Monrovia, Suite 310
Lenexa, KS 66215
913-647-7512

© 2025 Hamilton Law Firm LLC
View Our Disclaimer
Law Firm Website Design by The Modern Firm

Copyright © 2025 Hamilton Law Firm LLC