Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Hamilton Law Firm LLC
Hamilton Law Firm LLC

913-647-7512
Legal Question?

Menu
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
  • Why Choose Us
  • Representative Work
  • Legal News
  • Contact Us

Practice Areas

Business Litigation
Legal Malpractice
Local Counsel
Medical Malpractice
Nursing Home Abuse
Personal Injury
Product Liability
Wrongful Death

For More Information

Fill out our online form

Home » New Evidence In Toyota MDL

New Evidence In Toyota MDL

August 2nd, 2010
Posted By
Patrick Hamilton
Tweet

New York (August 02, 2010) -- Plaintiffs suing Toyota Motor Corp. over problems with sudden unintended acceleration have revised their lawsuit to include supposedly new evidence of internal e-mails showing the automaker knew years ago that some models required brake override systems to stop sudden speed-ups.

The first amended consolidated complaint, filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, represents more than 40 million consumers and companies who purchased or leased Toyota vehicles made in the U.S. with throttle control systems, according to plaintiffs' co-lead counsel Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.

Plaintiffs say in the new complaint that a federal investigator e-mailed a Toyota employee in 2004, telling the company that there was a more than 400 percent increase in “vehicle speed” complaints involving Toyota Camrys with electronically controlled throttles over those with manually controlled throttles.

Other e-mails among Toyota employees purportedly show that they knew years ago of complaints on the Internet of sudden acceleration in additional models, including Tacomas and Siennas, the complaint said.

“Plaintiffs have not cited a specific cause that would support their claim of a defect in Toyota’s Electronic Throttle Control System, and no credible scientific theory or proof has been advanced to support this allegation,” the company said in response to Monday's consolidated complaint.

“Toyota firmly believes that the system is completely safe and that reliable scientific evidence will demonstrate the safety of our vehicles in the investigations currently under way and, ultimately, to the court,” it said.

The company also rejected claims that the plaintiffs have suffered economic damages because of recent recalls, and it said it looked forward to defending itself against the new complaint.

What's more, Toyota said it had already identified and addressed two specific mechanical causes of possible unintended acceleration.

In April the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation centralized the litigation in California.

Toyota continues to face suits across the nation after announcing recalls involving more than 8 million vehicles worldwide, including 6 million in the U.S., mainly related to gas pedals that may become stuck under floor mats. Some suits blame the sudden acceleration problems on a defective electronic throttle control system, while other cases allege owners lost value on their cars because of the company recalls.

The company has also had to recall vehicles for other reasons, including a recall in late July of more than 400,000 Avalon sedans and Lexus 470 SUVs sold in the U.S. due to steering problems.

In early July the automaker recalled nearly 139,000 Lexus vehicles in the U.S. because of possibly faulty valve springs, which can cause abnormal engine noise or idling and, in rare instances, stalling.

The revised consolidated complaint was filed by Steve W. Berman of Hagens Berman and Mark M. Seltzer of Susman Godfrey LLP, co-lead counsel for consumers, as well as multiple other attorneys from additional firms.

Categories: Legal News

Practice Areas

Business Litigation
Legal Malpractice
Local Counsel
Medical Malpractice
Nursing Home Abuse
Personal Injury
Product Liability
Wrongful Death

For More Information

Fill out our online form

Recent Blog Posts

18
Negligence Lawsuits: What the Plaintiff Must Prove
February 18th, 2021
Negligence occurs when a party fails to exercise proper care and, as a result, damages occur. Laws surrounding negligence and liability vary from state to state, so it’s important to contact a Kansas and Missouri injury attorney to represent your c… Read More
6
Legal Malpractice: What You Must Prove
February 6th, 2017
If you believe you were not represented properly by an attorney, a Kansas legal malpractice attorney can help determine if you may have a claim. As you can imagine, pursuing a claim against an attorney can be an uphill battle. Attorneys that may be p… Read More

Read more from our blog

Representative Work

$170,000 Jury Verdict in Negligent Misrepresenation Case
On April 24, 2018, attorney Patrick Hamilton obtained a $170,000 jury verdict in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in a negligent misrepresentation case. Hamilton Law Firm’s client purchased a house in Kansas City, Missouri. Defendant Kathryn Sylvia was the seller’s real estate agent and an employee of defendant Platinum Realty. The sale was a “cash sale” in which payment was to be wired. The plaintiff received wiring instructions via email from Sylvia’s email account. Plaintiff forwarded the wiring instructions to his bank, which wired his money in accordance with the instructions. In actuality, the wiring instructions were prepared by a criminal hacker which caused plaintiff’s funds to be misdirected to Citi Bank in New York City. When the loss was discovered, plaintiff sued Sylvia and Platinum for negligent misrepresentation. The defendants claimed they did not email the wiring instructions to plaintiff and that plaintiff was comparatively negligent by not reviewing the wiring instructions before sending them to his bank. After a two day jury trial, the jury assigned defendants 85% of the fault and attributed 15% of the fault to plaintiff. Total damages were $196,622.67 with a net recovery to plaintiff of $167,129.27. Bain v. Platinum Realty LLC et al., Case No. 16-CV-02326-JWL. Read More
$280,000 Jury Verdict in Legal Malpractice Case (January 18, 2017)
On January 18, 2017, Hamilton Law Firm LLC obtained a $280,000.00 jury verdict in a legal malpractice lawsuit for Power Control Devices, Inc., an Olathe company specializing in the manufacture of electronic devices. The underlying litigation involved a breach of contract lawsuit against Orchid Engineering, Technologies and Consulting in the Boston, Massachusetts area. After PCD’s case had been pending for almost two years, Orchid filed a motion for summary judgment contending the lawsuit was not filed before the statutes of limitation expired. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts agreed, dismissing Power Control’s claims as untimely. Hamilton Law firm sued Power Control’s attorney in the underlying litigation, Michael “Mick” Lerner, for legal malpractice. After a seven day jury trial in Johnson County Kansas District Court, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Power Control. PCD Verdict Form 2617 Read More

Read more about our successes

Contact Us

Google Map of Hamilton Law Firm LLC’s Location
Hamilton Law Firm LLC
8700 Monrovia, Suite 310
Lenexa, KS 66215
913-647-7512

© 2025 Hamilton Law Firm LLC
View Our Disclaimer
Law Firm Website Design by The Modern Firm

Copyright © 2025 Hamilton Law Firm LLC